Analects · 為政篇第二

Read the witness. Inspect a construction. Follow the evidence.

+ Save passage to a list

Original source spelling · punctuation belongs to the digital witness · pronunciation tools follow your language focus.

為政篇第二 · 1821 characters
:「!!,,。」
READING NOTE · r034Predication / Structure

知之為知之,不知為不知

Treat knowing as knowing, and not knowing as not knowing.

zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes · Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed · CC BY-SA 4.0

A route through this passage

21 Han characters · 12 distinct forms · 6 units separated by the witness’s punctuation

  1. Establish the frame. Read the surrounding chapter. Who speaks, what is being discussed, and which earlier words supply the context?
  2. Test one unit. 誨女知之乎! Mark a possible predicate and its participants. Record what you have supplied rather than found explicitly in the text.
  3. Reconstruct the argument. Connect the units in your own words. Where does a description, question, contrast, or consequence depend on your interpretation?
Investigate 5 written forms in this passage

Matched by spelling. These are candidate reading procedures, not assigned grammatical analyses.

Watch recurrence: 知 × 6 之 × 3 為 × 2 不 × 2. Repetition of a graph need not mean repetition of a sense.

Computed from this exact witness · 1 contextual editorial excerpt also available. The guide is a set of reading prompts, not a translation. Sources & methods

Make this passage yours.

My review queue ↗

Use the reading guide above, build your interpretation, then test what you can recover. Your notes and schedule stay on this device.

1 · Explain it in your own words
Passage cards & Anki ↗
2 · Recover the wording

Select a source unit, then hide the passage and reconstruct it. This checks textual recall, not understanding.

3 · Explain, then revisit

What distinction does the parallel structure preserve?

Compare the editorial answer

Knowing something versus not knowing it.

zimai editorial draft · not independently reviewed. Applies to 知之為知之,不知為不知.

Rate your understanding yourself. These reminders use a simple schedule; they do not certify mastery.

Study controls are loading. Reading prompts and source links work without JavaScript.

Read this beside…

Each connection states its purpose. Comparisons are editorial learning aids; shared wording alone does not prove influence.

Question in commonAcknowledge what the evidence warrants

These passages support a learning exercise in intellectual restraint. The connection is an editorial comparison, not a claim of shared authorship or dependence.

A question to take further

Follow a connection

Shared teaching construction · an editorial learning connection, not evidence of common authorship or origin.

孟子 · Let parallel clauses constrain a reading古之人與民偕樂,故能樂也孟子 · Let parallel clauses constrain a reading鄰國之民不加少,寡人之民不加多孟子 · Let parallel clauses constrain a reading或百步而後止,或五十步而後止老子 · Let parallel clauses constrain a reading道可道,非恒道
Edition, source, and reuse
Work
論語 · Analects
Attribution
Traditionally associated with Confucius and his disciples; compiled across generations.
Digital witness
Kanseki Repository · KR1h0004 · base edition CHANT
Contributors
Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.
Source position
KR1h0004_002.txt, lines 139–144. LY 02.17; tr. CH
Version
89b65734d4386e2478179c77741a968bfc627abb
Reuse
CC BY-SA 4.0. Text extraction and teaching additions share this licence.
Text policy
Source spelling and punctuation retained. Encoding headers, page markers, paragraph markers, whitespace, and leading section numbers are removed from the reading view. No silent script conversion or textual correction.
Teaching
zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes. English renderings are excerpt-level reading aids, not a full published translation. Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed.
Exact source lines ↗ · Original UTF-8 file · Passage + annotation data

Source-file SHA-256: e589385d59f9a7cf8c205b706c5a76477d44991e9ec8160278ebe98e750c0364. A source comment that cites a translator is an upstream reference, not the attribution of a translation imported here.