Laozi · Daodejing · 第十八章

Read the witness. Inspect a construction. Follow the evidence.

+ Save passage to a list

Original source spelling · punctuation belongs to the digital witness · pronunciation tools follow your language focus.

第十八章 · 130 characters
,。,。,。,。
READING NOTE · r078Discourse / Structure

大道廢,安有仁義

When the great way is abandoned—how then do benevolence and righteousness stand?

zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes · Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed · CC BY-SA 4.0

A route through this passage

30 Han characters · 23 distinct forms · 8 units separated by the witness’s punctuation

  1. Establish the frame. Read the surrounding chapter. Who speaks, what is being discussed, and which earlier words supply the context?
  2. Test one unit. 安有仁義。 Mark a possible predicate and its participants. Record what you have supplied rather than found explicitly in the text.
  3. Reconstruct the argument. Connect the units in your own words. Where does a description, question, contrast, or consequence depend on your interpretation?
Investigate 2 written forms in this passage

Matched by spelling. These are candidate reading procedures, not assigned grammatical analyses.

Watch recurrence: 安 × 4 有 × 4 大 × 2. Repetition of a graph need not mean repetition of a sense.

Computed from this exact witness · 1 contextual editorial excerpt also available. The guide is a set of reading prompts, not a translation. Sources & methods

Make this passage yours.

My review queue ↗

Use the reading guide above, build your interpretation, then test what you can recover. Your notes and schedule stay on this device.

1 · Explain it in your own words
Passage cards & Anki ↗
2 · Recover the wording

Select a source unit, then hide the passage and reconstruct it. This checks textual recall, not understanding.

3 · Explain, then revisit

Why should a familiar wording not replace 安 here?

Compare the editorial answer

That would conceal a substantive textual and interpretive issue in this witness.

zimai editorial draft · not independently reviewed. Applies to 大道廢,安有仁義.

Rate your understanding yourself. These reminders use a simple schedule; they do not certify mastery.

Study controls are loading. Reading prompts and source links work without JavaScript.

Read this beside…

Each connection states its purpose. Comparisons are editorial learning aids; shared wording alone does not prove influence.

Textual evidenceDo not silently harmonize a familiar quotation

Keep 安有 and 說 as supplied by the selected witnesses; a normalized search representation is a separate layer.

A question to take further

Follow a connection

Shared teaching construction · an editorial learning connection, not evidence of common authorship or origin.

論語 · Let parallel clauses constrain a reading巧言令色,鮮矣仁論語 · Let parallel clauses constrain a reading父在,觀其志;父沒,觀其行論語 · Locate the unknown其斯之謂與論語 · Let parallel clauses constrain a reading道之以政,齊之以刑
Edition, source, and reuse
Work
老子 · Laozi · Daodejing
Attribution
Traditionally attributed to Laozi; composition and textual history are debated.
Digital witness
Kanseki Repository · KR5c0057 · base edition tls
Contributors
Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.
Source position
KR5c0057_018.txt, lines 14–21. LAO 18.1; tr. D.C. Lau 19i2: 27; here tr. Karlgren 1975
Version
8f585085ff4ef2580eeb0f4376a763a62bcc7a95
Reuse
CC BY-SA 4.0. Text extraction and teaching additions share this licence.
Text policy
Source spelling and punctuation retained. Encoding headers, page markers, paragraph markers, whitespace, and leading section numbers are removed from the reading view. No silent script conversion or textual correction.
Teaching
zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes. English renderings are excerpt-level reading aids, not a full published translation. Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed.
Exact source lines ↗ · Original UTF-8 file · Passage + annotation data

Source-file SHA-256: 79a9e59783dba644655bbc37eb4d2c11f96aece47befd8dc569731b1fdb537f8. A source comment that cites a translator is an upstream reference, not the attribution of a translation imported here.