Analects · 為政篇第二
Read the witness. Inspect a construction. Follow the evidence.
Original source spelling · punctuation belongs to the digital witness · pronunciation tools follow your language focus.
道之以政，齊之以刑
Guide them through governmental measures and regulate them through punishments.
zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes · Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed · CC BY-SA 4.0A route through this passage
27 Han characters · 18 distinct forms · 7 units separated by the witness’s punctuation
- Establish the frame. Read the surrounding chapter. Who speaks, what is being discussed, and which earlier words supply the context?
- Test one unit.
「道之以政，
Mark a possible predicate and its participants. Record what you have supplied rather than found explicitly in the text. - Reconstruct the argument. Connect the units in your own words. Where does a description, question, contrast, or consequence depend on your interpretation?
Investigate 4 written forms in this passage
Matched by spelling. These are candidate reading procedures, not assigned grammatical analyses.
Watch recurrence: 之 × 4 以 × 4 道 × 2 齊 × 2 恥 × 2. Repetition of a graph need not mean repetition of a sense.
Computed from this exact witness · 1 contextual editorial excerpt also available. The guide is a set of reading prompts, not a translation. Sources & methods
Make this passage yours.
Use the reading guide above, build your interpretation, then test what you can recover. Your notes and schedule stay on this device.
1 · Explain it in your own words
2 · Recover the wording
Select a source unit, then hide the passage and reconstruct it. This checks textual recall, not understanding.
3 · Explain, then revisit
Which two positions stay constant in the parallel clauses?
Compare the editorial answer
The object 之 and the 以 phrase following it.
zimai editorial draft · not independently reviewed. Applies to 道之以政，齊之以刑
.
Rate your understanding yourself. These reminders use a simple schedule; they do not certify mastery.
Study controls are loading. Reading prompts and source links work without JavaScript.
Read this beside…
Each connection states its purpose. Comparisons are editorial learning aids; shared wording alone does not prove influence.
Compare argumentsRead the effects claimed for the peopleCompare the stated outcomes and their subjects before attaching a modern political label.
Argument contrastConsistent standards and the response of subjectsHanfeizi’s measuring-cord analogy stresses the impartial line of a standard. The Analects contrasts the effects of punishments with virtue and ritual. These are different claims about government: consistency of application and the quality of the response it produces.
A question to take further
Follow a connection
Shared teaching construction · an editorial learning connection, not evidence of common authorship or origin.
孟子 · Identify means, basis, and purpose何以利吾國孟子 · Let parallel clauses constrain a reading古之人與民偕樂，故能樂也孟子 · Let parallel clauses constrain a reading鄰國之民不加少，寡人之民不加多孟子 · Identify means, basis, and purpose請以戰喻Edition, source, and reuse
- Work
- 論語 · Analects
- Attribution
- Traditionally associated with Confucius and his disciples; compiled across generations.
- Digital witness
- Kanseki Repository · KR1h0004 · base edition CHANT
- Contributors
- Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.
- Source position
- KR1h0004_002.txt, lines 31–37. LY 02.03; tr. CH
- Version
89b65734d4386e2478179c77741a968bfc627abb- Reuse
- CC BY-SA 4.0. Text extraction and teaching additions share this licence.
- Text policy
- Source spelling and punctuation retained. Encoding headers, page markers, paragraph markers, whitespace, and leading section numbers are removed from the reading view. No silent script conversion or textual correction.
- Teaching
- zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes. English renderings are excerpt-level reading aids, not a full published translation. Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed.
Source-file SHA-256: e589385d59f9a7cf8c205b706c5a76477d44991e9ec8160278ebe98e750c0364. A source comment that cites a translator is an upstream reference, not the attribution of a translation imported here.