Mencius · 梁惠王上

Read the witness. Inspect a construction. Follow the evidence.

+ Save passage to a list

Original source spelling · punctuation belongs to the digital witness · pronunciation tools follow your language focus.

梁惠王上 · 139 characters
。:「!,?」:「!?。
READING NOTE · r041Discourse

何必曰利

Why must you speak of profit?

zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes · Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed · CC BY-SA 4.0

A route through this passage

39 Han characters · 29 distinct forms · 9 units separated by the witness’s punctuation

  1. Establish the frame. Read the surrounding chapter. Who speaks, what is being discussed, and which earlier words supply the context?
  2. Test one unit. 孟子見梁惠王。 Mark a possible predicate and its participants. Record what you have supplied rather than found explicitly in the text.
  3. Reconstruct the argument. Connect the units in your own words. Where does a description, question, contrast, or consequence depend on your interpretation?
Investigate 8 written forms in this passage

Matched by spelling. These are candidate reading procedures, not assigned grammatical analyses.

Watch recurrence: 王 × 3 曰 × 3 孟 × 2 子 × 2 而 × 2 亦 × 2. Repetition of a graph need not mean repetition of a sense.

Computed from this exact witness · 1 contextual editorial excerpt also available. The guide is a set of reading prompts, not a translation. Sources & methods

Make this passage yours.

My review queue ↗

Use the reading guide above, build your interpretation, then test what you can recover. Your notes and schedule stay on this device.

1 · Explain it in your own words
Passage cards & Anki ↗
2 · Recover the wording

Select a source unit, then hide the passage and reconstruct it. This checks textual recall, not understanding.

3 · Explain, then revisit

What does the question challenge?

Compare the editorial answer

The necessity of framing the discussion in terms of profit.

zimai editorial draft · not independently reviewed. Applies to 何必曰利.

Rate your understanding yourself. These reminders use a simple schedule; they do not certify mastery.

Study controls are loading. Reading prompts and source links work without JavaScript.

Read this beside…

Each connection states its purpose. Comparisons are editorial learning aids; shared wording alone does not prove influence.

Rhetorical comparisonA question can change the terms

One reply challenges a ruler’s use of 利; the other questions the distinction between knowing and not knowing.

A question to take further

Shared wording

Computed exact phrases in the pinned witnesses. These links do not assign a sense or assert borrowing.

孟子 · 梁惠王上以利吾國

王曰:『何以利吾國?』大夫曰:『何以利吾家?』士庶人曰:『何以利吾身?』上下交征利而國危矣。

孟子 · 梁惠王上子見梁惠

孟子見梁惠王。王立於沼上,顧鴻鴈麋鹿,曰:「賢者亦樂此乎?」

孟子 · 告子下千里而來

況魯國乎?夫苟好善,則四海之內皆將輕千里而來告之以善;夫苟不好善,則人將曰:𧦧𧦧,『予既已知之矣。』𧦧𧦧

Follow a connection

Shared teaching construction · an editorial learning connection, not evidence of common authorship or origin.

論語 · Locate the unknown其斯之謂與論語 · Locate the unknown不敬,何以別乎論語 · Locate the unknown曾是以為孝乎老子 · Locate the unknown吾不知誰之子
Edition, source, and reuse
Work
孟子 · Mencius
Attribution
Traditionally associated with Meng Ke (Mencius) and his followers.
Digital witness
Kanseki Repository · KR1h0001 · base edition tls
Contributors
Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.
Source position
KR1h0001_001.txt, lines 11–18.
Version
8decdf43d5a82b779f7950a7782b9a5e09659564
Reuse
CC BY-SA 4.0. Text extraction and teaching additions share this licence.
Text policy
Source spelling and punctuation retained. Encoding headers, page markers, paragraph markers, whitespace, and leading section numbers are removed from the reading view. No silent script conversion or textual correction.
Teaching
zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes. English renderings are excerpt-level reading aids, not a full published translation. Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed.
Exact source lines ↗ · Original UTF-8 file · Passage + annotation data

Source-file SHA-256: d2b1fc13fb9018c7e23dff284caf4c9fa29021b312ef6951cb3c23257ea1d3aa. A source comment that cites a translator is an upstream reference, not the attribution of a translation imported here.