Mencius · 盡心下

Read the witness. Inspect a construction. Follow the evidence.

+ Save passage to a list

Original source spelling · punctuation belongs to the digital witness · pronunciation tools follow your language focus.

盡心下 · 444 characters
:「《》,《》。《》,。,,?」
READING NOTE · r159Connection / Predication

盡信《書》,則不如無《書》

To trust the Documents in every detail would be worse than having no Documents.

zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes · Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed · CC BY-SA 4.0

A route through this passage

44 Han characters · 36 distinct forms · 8 units separated by the witness’s punctuation

  1. Establish the frame. Read the surrounding chapter. Who speaks, what is being discussed, and which earlier words supply the context?
  2. Test one unit. 則不如無《書》。 Mark a possible predicate and its participants. Record what you have supplied rather than found explicitly in the text.
  3. Reconstruct the argument. Connect the units in your own words. Where does a description, question, contrast, or consequence depend on your interpretation?
Investigate 8 written forms in this passage

Matched by spelling. These are candidate reading procedures, not assigned grammatical analyses.

Watch recurrence: 仁 × 3 書 × 2 不 × 2 無 × 2 於 × 2 而 × 2. Repetition of a graph need not mean repetition of a sense.

Computed from this exact witness · 1 contextual editorial excerpt also available. The guide is a set of reading prompts, not a translation. Sources & methods

Make this passage yours.

My review queue ↗

Use the reading guide above, build your interpretation, then test what you can recover. Your notes and schedule stay on this device.

1 · Explain it in your own words
Passage cards & Anki ↗
2 · Recover the wording

Select a source unit, then hide the passage and reconstruct it. This checks textual recall, not understanding.

3 · Explain, then revisit

What narrows the target of the criticism?

Compare the editorial answer

The explicit reference to the Documents and then to its Wu cheng section.

zimai editorial draft · not independently reviewed. Applies to 盡信《書》,則不如無《書》.

Rate your understanding yourself. These reminders use a simple schedule; they do not certify mastery.

Study controls are loading. Reading prompts and source links work without JavaScript.

Read this beside…

Each connection states its purpose. Comparisons are editorial learning aids; shared wording alone does not prove influence.

Question in commonAcknowledge what the evidence warrants

These passages support a learning exercise in intellectual restraint. The connection is an editorial comparison, not a claim of shared authorship or dependence.

Argument contrastTwo ways to question inherited authority

Hanfeizi makes changed circumstances a reason to reconsider practices. Mencius challenges unqualified acceptance of a particular received text. The comparison concerns how a reader evaluates inheritance; it does not make their standards of judgment identical.

A question to take further

Shared wording

Computed exact phrases in the pinned witnesses. These links do not assign a sense or assert borrowing.

荀子 · 議兵篇第十五無敵於天

感忽悠闇,莫知其所從出;孫、吳用之,無敵於天下,豈必待附民哉!」

荀子 · 正論篇第十八無敵於天

舜擅讓。」是不然。天子者、埶位至尊,無敵於天下,夫有誰與讓矣?道德純備,智惠甚明,南面而聽天下,生民之屬莫不振動從服以化順之,

孟子 · 公孫丑上無敵於天

母,自生民以來未有能濟者也。如此,則無敵於天下。無敵於天下者,天吏也。然而不王者,未之有也。」

Follow a connection

Shared teaching construction · an editorial learning connection, not evidence of common authorship or origin.

論語 · Keep different negatives apart未之有也論語 · Follow a condition and its consequence行有餘力,則以學文論語 · Follow a condition and its consequence過則勿憚改論語 · Identify a comparison and its standard未若貧而樂道,富而好禮者也
Edition, source, and reuse
Work
孟子 · Mencius
Attribution
Traditionally associated with Meng Ke (Mencius) and his followers.
Digital witness
Kanseki Repository · KR1h0001 · base edition tls
Contributors
Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.
Source position
KR1h0001_014.txt, lines 48–55. MENG 7B03:01 tr. D. C. Lau 2.287
Version
8decdf43d5a82b779f7950a7782b9a5e09659564
Reuse
CC BY-SA 4.0. Text extraction and teaching additions share this licence.
Text policy
Source spelling and punctuation retained. Encoding headers, page markers, paragraph markers, whitespace, and leading section numbers are removed from the reading view. No silent script conversion or textual correction.
Teaching
zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes. English renderings are excerpt-level reading aids, not a full published translation. Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed.
Exact source lines ↗ · Original UTF-8 file · Passage + annotation data

Source-file SHA-256: b93f09f92fbe00edf084a832fd7a24f4176866c97f9013e8709c4f705176241e. A source comment that cites a translator is an upstream reference, not the attribution of a translation imported here.