{"id":"mengzi-014-0004","work":"mengzi","chapter":"mengzi-014","chapterTitle":"盡心下","chapterNumber":14,"ordinal":4,"text":"孟子曰：「盡信《書》，則不如無《書》。吾於《武成》，取二三策而已矣。仁人無敵於天下，以至仁伐至不仁，而何其血之流杵也？」","source":{"repository":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0001","commit":"8decdf43d5a82b779f7950a7782b9a5e09659564","file":"KR1h0001_014.txt","lineStart":48,"lineEnd":55,"fileSha256":"b93f09f92fbe00edf084a832fd7a24f4176866c97f9013e8709c4f705176241e","edition":"tls","sourceLabels":["MENG 7B03:01 tr. D. C. Lau 2.287"],"sourceUrl":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0001/blob/8decdf43d5a82b779f7950a7782b9a5e09659564/KR1h0001_014.txt#L48-L55","rawUrl":"/data/classical-0.12.0/sources/KR1h0001/KR1h0001_014.txt","author":"Traditionally associated with Meng Ke (Mencius) and his followers.","contributor":"Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"},"route":"/classical/passage/mengzi-014-0004/","notes":[{"id":"r159","passage":"mengzi-014-0004","quote":"盡信《書》，則不如無《書》","focus":"則","start":5,"end":18,"focusStart":11,"topics":["ze","comparison","negation"],"translation":"To trust the Documents in every detail would be worse than having no Documents.","note":"《書》 identifies the textual collection being evaluated, not every written book without distinction. The next sentence names Wu cheng and limits what is accepted from it. The provocative comparison makes a case for judgment within reading, rather than a blanket rejection of textual learning.","question":"What narrows the target of the criticism?","answer":"The explicit reference to the Documents and then to its Wu cheng section.","attribution":{"author":"zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes","status":"Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","revision":"0.12.0"}}],"previous":"mengzi-014-0003","next":"mengzi-014-0005","nearby":[{"id":"mengzi-014-0001","ordinal":1,"text":"孟子曰：「不仁哉梁惠王也！仁者以其所愛及其所不愛，不仁者以其所不愛及其所愛。」公孫丑問曰：「何謂也？」","annotated":false},{"id":"mengzi-014-0002","ordinal":2,"text":"「梁惠王以土地之故，糜爛其民而戰之，大敗，將復之，恐不能勝，故驅其所愛子弟以殉之，是之謂以其所不愛及其所愛也。","annotated":false},{"id":"mengzi-014-0003","ordinal":3,"text":"孟子曰：「春秋無義戰。彼善於此，則有之矣。征者，上伐下也，敵國不相征也。」","annotated":false},{"id":"mengzi-014-0004","ordinal":4,"text":"孟子曰：「盡信《書》，則不如無《書》。吾於《武成》，取二三策而已矣。仁人無敵於天下，以至仁伐至不仁，而何其血之流杵也？」","annotated":true},{"id":"mengzi-014-0005","ordinal":5,"text":"孟子曰：「有人曰：『我善為陳，我善為戰。』大罪也。國君好仁，天下無敵焉。南面而征，北狄怨；東面而征，西夷怨，曰：『奚為後我？』","annotated":false},{"id":"mengzi-014-0006","ordinal":6,"text":"武王之伐殷也，革車三百兩，虎賁三千人。王曰：『無畏！寧爾也，非敵百姓也。』","annotated":false},{"id":"mengzi-014-0007","ordinal":7,"text":"若崩厥角稽首。征之為言正也，各欲正己也，焉用戰？」","annotated":false},{"id":"mengzi-014-0008","ordinal":8,"text":"孟子曰：「梓匠輪輿能與人規矩，不能使人巧。」","annotated":false},{"id":"mengzi-014-0009","ordinal":9,"text":"孟子曰：「舜之飯糗茹草也，若將終身焉；及其為天子也，被袗衣，鼓琴，二女果，若固有之。」","annotated":false}],"related":[{"id":"lunyu-001-0002","workTitle":"論語","text":"未之有也","reason":"Keep different negatives apart"},{"id":"lunyu-001-0007","workTitle":"論語","text":"行有餘力，則以學文","reason":"Follow a condition and its consequence"},{"id":"lunyu-001-0009","workTitle":"論語","text":"過則勿憚改","reason":"Follow a condition and its consequence"},{"id":"lunyu-001-0016","workTitle":"論語","text":"未若貧而樂道，富而好禮者也","reason":"Identify a comparison and its standard"}],"knowledge":[{"id":"evidence-and-interpretation","title":"What the text says—and what we infer"}],"connections":[{"id":"knowing-and-reading","title":"Acknowledge what the evidence warrants","label":"Question in common","reason":"These passages support a learning exercise in intellectual restraint. The connection is an editorial comparison, not a claim of shared authorship or dependence."},{"id":"judging-the-past","title":"Two ways to question inherited authority","label":"Argument contrast","reason":"Hanfeizi makes changed circumstances a reason to reconsider practices. Mencius challenges unqualified acceptance of a particular received text. The comparison concerns how a reader evaluates inheritance; it does not make their standards of judgment identical."}],"phraseConnections":[{"phrase":"無敵於天","id":"xunzi-015-0003","route":"/classical/passage/xunzi-015-0003/","workTitle":"荀子","chapterTitle":"議兵篇第十五","text":"感忽悠闇，莫知其所從出；孫、吳用之，無敵於天下，豈必待附民哉！」","cross":true,"frequency":6},{"phrase":"無敵於天","id":"xunzi-018-0028","route":"/classical/passage/xunzi-018-0028/","workTitle":"荀子","chapterTitle":"正論篇第十八","text":"舜擅讓。」是不然。天子者、埶位至尊，無敵於天下，夫有誰與讓矣？道德純備，智惠甚明，南面而聽天下，生民之屬莫不振動從服以化順之，","cross":true,"frequency":6},{"phrase":"無敵於天","id":"mengzi-003-0060","route":"/classical/passage/mengzi-003-0060/","workTitle":"孟子","chapterTitle":"公孫丑上","text":"母，自生民以來未有能濟者也。如此，則無敵於天下。無敵於天下者，天吏也。然而不王者，未之有也。」","cross":false,"frequency":6}],"studyRecord":{"route":"/classical/passage/mengzi-014-0004/","text":"孟子曰：「盡信《書》，則不如無《書》。吾於《武成》，取二三策而已矣。仁人無敵於天下，以至仁伐至不仁，而何其血之流杵也？」","kind":"passage","script":"Hant","definitions":["盡信《書》，則不如無《書》 — To trust the Documents in every detail would be worse than having no Documents."],"mandarin":"","cantonese":[],"characters":[],"edition":"孟子 · 盡心下 · 4","dataset":"Kanseki Repository · KR1h0001","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","sourceUrl":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0001/blob/8decdf43d5a82b779f7950a7782b9a5e09659564/KR1h0001_014.txt#L48-L55","source":{"line":48,"recordSha256":"ad88ebb2f433e4975c03f291c0f0b7c23e8adbad1a4fe97489279f19d73c664f"},"classical":{"author":"Traditionally associated with Meng Ke (Mencius) and his followers.","contributor":"Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.","source":{"repository":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0001","commit":"8decdf43d5a82b779f7950a7782b9a5e09659564","file":"KR1h0001_014.txt","lineStart":48,"lineEnd":55,"fileSha256":"b93f09f92fbe00edf084a832fd7a24f4176866c97f9013e8709c4f705176241e","edition":"tls","sourceLabels":["MENG 7B03:01 tr. D. C. Lau 2.287"],"sourceUrl":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0001/blob/8decdf43d5a82b779f7950a7782b9a5e09659564/KR1h0001_014.txt#L48-L55","rawUrl":"/data/classical-0.12.0/sources/KR1h0001/KR1h0001_014.txt","author":"Traditionally associated with Meng Ke (Mencius) and his followers.","contributor":"Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"},"notes":[{"id":"r159","passage":"mengzi-014-0004","quote":"盡信《書》，則不如無《書》","focus":"則","start":5,"end":18,"focusStart":11,"topics":["ze","comparison","negation"],"translation":"To trust the Documents in every detail would be worse than having no Documents.","note":"《書》 identifies the textual collection being evaluated, not every written book without distinction. The next sentence names Wu cheng and limits what is accepted from it. The provocative comparison makes a case for judgment within reading, rather than a blanket rejection of textual learning.","question":"What narrows the target of the criticism?","answer":"The explicit reference to the Documents and then to its Wu cheng section.","attribution":{"author":"zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes","status":"Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","revision":"0.12.0"}}],"editorial":{"author":"zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes","status":"Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","revision":"0.12.0"},"interpretationScope":"English is provided only for the quoted teaching excerpt; source passage remains unchanged."}}}