{"id":"lunyu-002-0009","work":"lunyu","chapter":"lunyu-002","chapterTitle":"為政篇第二","chapterNumber":2,"ordinal":9,"text":"子夏問孝。子曰：「色難。有事，弟子服其勞；有酒食，先生饌，曾是以為孝乎？」","source":{"repository":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0004","commit":"89b65734d4386e2478179c77741a968bfc627abb","file":"KR1h0004_002.txt","lineStart":83,"lineEnd":90,"fileSha256":"e589385d59f9a7cf8c205b706c5a76477d44991e9ec8160278ebe98e750c0364","edition":"CHANT","sourceLabels":["LY 02.08; tr. CH"],"sourceUrl":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0004/blob/89b65734d4386e2478179c77741a968bfc627abb/KR1h0004_002.txt#L83-L90","rawUrl":"/data/classical-0.12.0/sources/KR1h0004/KR1h0004_002.txt","author":"Traditionally associated with Confucius and his disciples; compiled across generations.","contributor":"Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"},"route":"/classical/passage/lunyu-002-0009/","notes":[{"id":"r026","passage":"lunyu-002-0009","quote":"曾是以為孝乎","focus":"乎","start":29,"end":35,"focusStart":34,"topics":["hu","question"],"translation":"Can this really be counted as filial conduct?","note":"The question tests whether material service alone is enough. 是 points to the conduct described just before it. The line’s rhetorical force should remain visible instead of being flattened into a neutral definition of 孝.","question":"What does the speaker challenge?","answer":"Whether the described material service suffices as filial conduct.","attribution":{"author":"zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes","status":"Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","revision":"0.12.0"}}],"previous":"lunyu-002-0008","next":"lunyu-002-0010","nearby":[{"id":"lunyu-002-0006","ordinal":6,"text":"樊遲御，子告之曰：「孟孫問孝於我，我對曰：『無違。』」樊遲曰：「何謂也？」子曰：「生，事之以禮；死，葬之以禮，祭之以禮。」","annotated":true},{"id":"lunyu-002-0007","ordinal":7,"text":"孟武伯問孝。子曰：「父母唯其疾之憂。」","annotated":false},{"id":"lunyu-002-0008","ordinal":8,"text":"子游問孝。子曰：「今之孝者，是謂能養。至於犬馬，皆能有養；不敬，何以別乎？」","annotated":true},{"id":"lunyu-002-0009","ordinal":9,"text":"子夏問孝。子曰：「色難。有事，弟子服其勞；有酒食，先生饌，曾是以為孝乎？」","annotated":true},{"id":"lunyu-002-0010","ordinal":10,"text":"子曰：「吾與回言終日，不違，如愚。退而省其私，亦足以發，回也不愚。」","annotated":true},{"id":"lunyu-002-0011","ordinal":11,"text":"子曰：「視其所以，觀其所由，察其所安。人焉廋哉？人焉廋哉？」","annotated":true},{"id":"lunyu-002-0012","ordinal":12,"text":"子曰：「溫故而知新，可以為師矣。」","annotated":true},{"id":"lunyu-002-0013","ordinal":13,"text":"子曰：「君子不器。」","annotated":true},{"id":"lunyu-002-0014","ordinal":14,"text":"子貢問君子。子曰：「先行其言而後從之。」","annotated":true}],"related":[{"id":"mengzi-001-0001","workTitle":"孟子","text":"何必曰利","reason":"Locate the unknown"},{"id":"mengzi-001-0010","workTitle":"孟子","text":"雖有臺池鳥獸，豈能獨樂哉","reason":"Locate the unknown"},{"id":"laozi-004-0001","workTitle":"老子","text":"吾不知誰之子","reason":"Locate the unknown"},{"id":"laozi-010-0001","workTitle":"老子","text":"能無離乎","reason":"Recognize a question or an exclamation"}],"knowledge":[],"connections":[],"phraseConnections":[],"studyRecord":{"route":"/classical/passage/lunyu-002-0009/","text":"子夏問孝。子曰：「色難。有事，弟子服其勞；有酒食，先生饌，曾是以為孝乎？」","kind":"passage","script":"Hant","definitions":["曾是以為孝乎 — Can this really be counted as filial conduct?"],"mandarin":"","cantonese":[],"characters":[],"edition":"論語 · 為政篇第二 · 9","dataset":"Kanseki Repository · KR1h0004","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","sourceUrl":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0004/blob/89b65734d4386e2478179c77741a968bfc627abb/KR1h0004_002.txt#L83-L90","source":{"line":83,"recordSha256":"f82d2d26b468fb7b0360ec37e86f9835155dcd8984189c376ab7de1b79345f7b"},"classical":{"author":"Traditionally associated with Confucius and his disciples; compiled across generations.","contributor":"Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.","source":{"repository":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0004","commit":"89b65734d4386e2478179c77741a968bfc627abb","file":"KR1h0004_002.txt","lineStart":83,"lineEnd":90,"fileSha256":"e589385d59f9a7cf8c205b706c5a76477d44991e9ec8160278ebe98e750c0364","edition":"CHANT","sourceLabels":["LY 02.08; tr. CH"],"sourceUrl":"https://github.com/kanripo/KR1h0004/blob/89b65734d4386e2478179c77741a968bfc627abb/KR1h0004_002.txt#L83-L90","rawUrl":"/data/classical-0.12.0/sources/KR1h0004/KR1h0004_002.txt","author":"Traditionally associated with Confucius and his disciples; compiled across generations.","contributor":"Kanseki Repository (Kanripo) contributors; upstream base-edition labels retained in each original file.","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"},"notes":[{"id":"r026","passage":"lunyu-002-0009","quote":"曾是以為孝乎","focus":"乎","start":29,"end":35,"focusStart":34,"topics":["hu","question"],"translation":"Can this really be counted as filial conduct?","note":"The question tests whether material service alone is enough. 是 points to the conduct described just before it. The line’s rhetorical force should remain visible instead of being flattened into a neutral definition of 孝.","question":"What does the speaker challenge?","answer":"Whether the described material service suffices as filial conduct.","attribution":{"author":"zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes","status":"Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","revision":"0.12.0"}}],"editorial":{"author":"zimai · AI-assisted editorial notes","status":"Editorial pilot · not independently reviewed","license":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licenseUrl":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","revision":"0.12.0"},"interpretationScope":"English is provided only for the quoted teaching excerpt; source passage remains unchanged."}}}